h and Chi Persei, 3.5 hrs, StellaVita

 Posted: Aug 10th, 2026
Show astrometry on hover
NGC
IC
HD
Technical Info
Telescope/Lens: Sky-Watcher ED80
Camera: Player One Ares-C
Mount: Sky-Watcher HEQ5 PRO
Software: Nina, PixInsight
Accessories: Touptek StellaVita
Exposure:
111 x 120" ISO/Gain: 100 - Optolong L-Pro 2"
Orange, Bortle 6 zone:
 Sofrino, Russia
 Aug 9th, 2026
3 h 42 m
6
Resolution: 2989x2994 px
Scale: 2414 KB

Technical frame to test the equipment

First successful test of StellaVita (the first one was a complete failure). I deliberately chose an object with only stars to make it clear how our guiding is doing.

I'll note the pros and cons for the record:
1. CON: no focusing mode.
In ASIAir there's a mode that displays a circle around the star on screen, large and frequently updated, along with its HFR and a brightness graph. That's about 10-20 frames per second, live video from the main camera.
In StellaVita there's nothing except getting a frame from the camera — there's only live camera view, and "live" means exposure (1 sec) plus receiving that frame on the phone (2 sec).

2. CON: StellaVita lost connection to the home WiFi (bridge mode) and it was nearly impossible to get it back. It wouldn't connect no matter what, and I even had to check the access point logs. Eventually I managed to restore it — unclear what exactly worked, but it came back and didn't drop again.

3. PRO: on the guider screen you can see the image from the guiding camera, just like in PHD2 Guider. There's still no image output mode for focusing the guider, but ZWO doesn't have that either (it's worse there — you can't view the guider image at all).

4. CON: no HFR graph of stars during imaging. ASIAir doesn't have it either. How are you supposed to use this computer if you can't tell when you need to refocus?! (That's why ASIAir has the pointless "refocus every 0.5, 1, or 2 hours" — but what if I need it less often? What if I don't need it at all because the temperature hasn't changed today and focus hasn't drifted?!)

5. PRO: it calibrated quickly, guided without issues, plate solving is reliable, and polar alignment is convenient though a bit small on screen : the phone is clearly not in your hand at that moment, but somewhere down below, and you have to make out where the arrow points — compare that to NINA Three Star Polar Alignment, where numbers and arrows are huge as if for the blind, and that's the right way.

Overall — it's usable. You'll suffer, but you can use it. A balanced trade-off between suffering and the benefits of not having a control computer on the mount and a laptop in your hands.

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments on this picture yet

Comments are available only to registered users. Register or log in to leave a comment.