DeepSkyHosting

NGC 7635

Category:Deep Sky
Published:
472
NGC 7635NGC 7635NGC 7654
Resolution:
5926x3872 px
File size:
27054 KB

Photo description / processing

second version, in red. Which one do you prefer?

Technical information

Telescope/Lens
Askar 103 APO 0.8X
Camera
ZWO ASI 2600MC Pro
Mount
ZWO AM5N
Guide Scope
60mm Guide Scope
Guide Camera
ZWO ASI462MC
Software
Adobe Photoshop, Siril
Location
Pyatigorsk, Russia

Light pollution

Red, Bortle 7 zone

Date taken

Exposure

  • 236 × 180″ · ISO/Gain: 100 · SVBony 220 ·

Total exposure: 11 h 48 m

Photo versions

NGC 7635
Current photoUpdated
NGC 7635

Oct 14th, 2025

11 h 48 m

second version, in red. Which one do you prefer?

NGC 7635
NGC 7635

Sep 25th, 2025

11 h 48 m

first light on new equipment, and essentially the first object in the last 7 years. Unfortunately, I didn't shoot RGB for the stars.

Show changes
Previous version
Current version

Comments

dmcl
It shoots very well at X0.8. But at X0.6, it's complete junk. I found a thread about this on the Astrobin forum. They say adding a 2mm spacer to the back focus significantly improves the situation. I'll try it today. I'm skeptical, but I need to find a way to adapt this reducer somehow.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

HerostReply to dmcl
I was reading about this just yesterday. Surprisingly, not every telescope performs poorly with this reducer. I had planned to buy a 0.6x, but I’ll hold off for now. I’ve read about the spacer for the back focus—it seems to be a practical solution from what people write. I have a 1x for this telescope, and it works without any issues.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

dmclReply to Herost
With 1x, there's one problem—f/7. And that kills the desire to buy it. If the setup were permanently installed, you could still live with it. But I drive 60 km out of the city every time. And time becomes expensive at f/7.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

HerostReply to dmcl
60 km isn't that much; I drive 260 km for the sky. Yes, f/7 is certainly a narrow aperture. I took it to snap a couple of galaxies, and maybe to play around with the Moon using a Barlow.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

dmclReply to Herost
Tried the 0.6X reducer today. Spent about an hour adjusting spacers. The best result came from extending the back focus by 3.1mm. Overall, the result is decent. Stars are slightly soft at the edges. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1i1yUGnneszbi-aHAul6wDqviu-MdMlku/view?usp=sharing
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

More photos by Herost