May 20th, 2025
9 h 35 m
Added to the previous image with a 3nm Optolong L-Ultimate filter (imaging from 08.05), imaging from 16th, 17th, 18th of May with wider band filters Askar Colour Magic C1 (H O) and C2 (Sii O). Combined and processed in the SHO palette. A red nebula appeared on the right, only when I checked in Stellarium did I realize it was the nebula around the Garnet Star. I didn't find images of it on our hosting, but on astrobin.com it appears a couple of times. One of the most beautiful objects in the Universe – the Garnet Star, located in the constellation Cepheus. At the same time, it is one of the largest and most powerful stars in our Galaxy. The deep red color of the star was first noted by astronomer William Herschel, which is why it is also called "Herschel's Star". It is a red supergiant, whose diameter is many times greater than the diameter of the Sun, reaching 3.5 billion kilometers. It is one of the largest and brightest stars named Mu Cephei. If placed in the center of the Solar System, this star would engulf all planets up to and including Saturn. Mu Cephei is very bright: in this indicator it is 60 thousand times greater than the Sun, and in luminosity – 350 thousand times. The star's temperature is 3700 K. A variable star with a complex light curve that changes every 2–2.5 years. The distance to the star is 5255 light years. The star Mu Cephei is gradually dying. Main sequence stars synthesize helium from the hydrogen they burn. But if evolution reaches its peak, a different process starts: stars release carbon by burning helium. This is exactly what is happening now with Herschel's Garnet Star. How long it will still exist – scientists do not know, but they are sure that it will explode as a supernova, the core of which will turn into a black hole.












Comments
How are you liking the SQA55? I'm considering it, or the SQA70, for the same 571 camera.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
It's a great telescope, the only downside is that it has a very small sweet spot, and when using the L-Ultimate filter, I can't get the focuser to achieve focus—it focuses on overexposed pixels. There are few bright stars, and the rest look like pixels. There's no problem when using a UV/IR filter. So, after setting the focus at 1.47, by morning it had drifted to 1.72, causing a loss of sharpness because of this.
Now, I would go for a 70mm, but that would require a full-frame camera, and it's all too expensive. We'll keep shooting with this one.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
Reply
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.
Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.