DeepSkyHosting

IC 1396 SHO and the Nebula around the Garnet Star

Category:Deep Sky
Published:
1519
IC 1396 SHO and the Nebula around the Garnet StarIC 1396
Resolution:
5826x3872 px
File size:
4332 KB

Photo description / processing

Added to the previous image with a 3nm Optolong L-Ultimate filter (imaging from 08.05), imaging from 16th, 17th, 18th of May with wider band filters Askar Colour Magic C1 (H O) and C2 (Sii O). Combined and processed in the SHO palette. A red nebula appeared on the right, only when I checked in Stellarium did I realize it was the nebula around the Garnet Star. I didn't find images of it on our hosting, but on astrobin.com it appears a couple of times. One of the most beautiful objects in the Universe – the Garnet Star, located in the constellation Cepheus. At the same time, it is one of the largest and most powerful stars in our Galaxy. The deep red color of the star was first noted by astronomer William Herschel, which is why it is also called "Herschel's Star". It is a red supergiant, whose diameter is many times greater than the diameter of the Sun, reaching 3.5 billion kilometers. It is one of the largest and brightest stars named Mu Cephei. If placed in the center of the Solar System, this star would engulf all planets up to and including Saturn. Mu Cephei is very bright: in this indicator it is 60 thousand times greater than the Sun, and in luminosity – 350 thousand times. The star's temperature is 3700 K. A variable star with a complex light curve that changes every 2–2.5 years. The distance to the star is 5255 light years. The star Mu Cephei is gradually dying. Main sequence stars synthesize helium from the hydrogen they burn. But if evolution reaches its peak, a different process starts: stars release carbon by burning helium. This is exactly what is happening now with Herschel's Garnet Star. How long it will still exist – scientists do not know, but they are sure that it will explode as a supernova, the core of which will turn into a black hole.

Technical information

Telescope/Lens
Askar SQA55
Camera
Touptek IMX 571 C
Mount
JUWEI-14
Guide Scope
Finder 30
Guide Camera
T7M
Accessories
WandererBoxLiteV3 USB3.0 разводка питания, хаб.
Software
N.I.N.A., Pixinsight, Adobe Photoshop
Location
Екатеринбург, район озера Глухое., Россия

Light pollution

Orange, Bortle 6 zone

Date taken

Exposure

  • 16 × 600″ · ISO/Gain: 152 · Optolong L-Ultimate ·
  • 34 × 300″ · ISO/Gain: 152 · Askar Colour Magic C1 (HO) ·
  • 49 × 300″ · ISO/Gain: 152 · Askar Colour Magic C2 (SiiO) ·

Total exposure: 9 h 35 m

Photo versions

IC 1396 SHO and the Nebula around the Garnet Star
Current photoUpdated
IC 1396 SHO and the Nebula around the Garnet Star

May 20th, 2025

9 h 35 m

Added to the previous image with a 3nm Optolong L-Ultimate filter (imaging from 08.05), imaging from 16th, 17th, 18th of May with wider band filters Askar Colour Magic C1 (H O) and C2 (Sii O). Combined and processed in the SHO palette. A red nebula appeared on the right, only when I checked in Stellarium did I realize it was the nebula around the Garnet Star. I didn't find images of it on our hosting, but on astrobin.com it appears a couple of times. One of the most beautiful objects in the Universe – the Garnet Star, located in the constellation Cepheus. At the same time, it is one of the largest and most powerful stars in our Galaxy. The deep red color of the star was first noted by astronomer William Herschel, which is why it is also called "Herschel's Star". It is a red supergiant, whose diameter is many times greater than the diameter of the Sun, reaching 3.5 billion kilometers. It is one of the largest and brightest stars named Mu Cephei. If placed in the center of the Solar System, this star would engulf all planets up to and including Saturn. Mu Cephei is very bright: in this indicator it is 60 thousand times greater than the Sun, and in luminosity – 350 thousand times. The star's temperature is 3700 K. A variable star with a complex light curve that changes every 2–2.5 years. The distance to the star is 5255 light years. The star Mu Cephei is gradually dying. Main sequence stars synthesize helium from the hydrogen they burn. But if evolution reaches its peak, a different process starts: stars release carbon by burning helium. This is exactly what is happening now with Herschel's Garnet Star. How long it will still exist – scientists do not know, but they are sure that it will explode as a supernova, the core of which will turn into a black hole.

IC 1396
IC 1396

May 9th, 2025

2 h 40 m

Finally assembled a setup with power distribution and a hub from WandererBoxLiteV3 USB3.0. Got rid of a bunch of wires, now everything runs from one 8-amp power supply. Power consumption is around 2-3 amps. And about 1-1.5 amps of that goes to camera cooling. Next step is to make autonomous power from batteries for trips to darker skies, as the suburbs are already quite tiresome. The total weight of the setup is about 9.5 kg including the tripod, computer with monitor.

Show changes
Previous version
Current version

Comments

Oleg Novoselov
Thanks!
It's a great telescope, the only downside is that it has a very small sweet spot, and when using the L-Ultimate filter, I can't get the focuser to achieve focus—it focuses on overexposed pixels. There are few bright stars, and the rest look like pixels. There's no problem when using a UV/IR filter. So, after setting the focus at 1.47, by morning it had drifted to 1.72, causing a loss of sharpness because of this.
Now, I would go for a 70mm, but that would require a full-frame camera, and it's all too expensive. We'll keep shooting with this one.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Ryjov AlekseyReply to Bootlegger
I have an Askar SQA 85, and I’ll soon receive an Askar SQA 106. I love shooting galaxies, and of course, the larger the aperture and focal length, the better suited it is for such purposes. I haven’t seen a better astrograph yet, but that’s just my amateur opinion. In any case, you won’t be disappointed if you buy an SQA series.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Oleg NovoselovReply to Ryjov Aleksey
I shot with it using dark frames, and it's quite forgiving with them, allowing about 5 degrees of deviation. Of course, you can't do very long exposures—the well depth is small—but 1 to 2 minutes is easy. Usually, I check: if there are no bright stars and the object is faint, you can go longer. As for cooling, here's the thing: in summer we hardly shoot at all because of the white nights. By autumn, nighttime temperatures are already closer to 10 degrees or even lower, so it works out fine. It's a different story if you take it south, where nights are like our summers—then cooling is absolutely necessary.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

More photos by Oleg Novoselov