DeepSkyHosting

IC405

Sergeich
1902032
Category:Deep Sky
Published:
578
IC405IC 410NGC 1893NGC 1907NGC 1912NGC 1931NGC 1960IC 405IC 417
Resolution:
2094x1397 px
File size:
1142 KB

Technical information

Telescope/Lens
Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC
Camera
Canon EOS 60Da
Mount
iOptron SkyTracker Pro
Accessories
SVBONY CLS Filter
Software
Siril, StarNet, Adobe Photoshop
Location
Perm, Russia

Light pollution

Green, Bortle 4 zone

Date taken

Exposure

  • 66 × 120″ · ISO/Gain: 640 · f/2.8 ·
  • 15 × 60″ · ISO/Gain: 640 · f/2.8 ·

Total exposure: 2 h 27 m

Photo versions

IC405
Current photoUpdated
IC405

Nov 11th, 2025

2 h 27 m

IC405
IC405

Mar 30th, 2025

1 h 9 m

I reposted in Fitstacker - and indeed it got better.

IC405
IC405

Oct 31st, 2024

31 m

A short series of 15 minutes while I was putting out the fire, packing my things, and warming up the car after the main session.

Show changes
Previous version
Current version

Comments

poppy8micro
I noticed that you always stop down your 2.8 aperture—does it cause stars to bloom too much at f/2?
I recently tried the Samyang 85mm, and at f/2.8, the red channel is noticeably out of focus compared to the green and blue.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

SergeichReply to poppy8micro
And it expands, and the gap between channels increases, making it harder to focus: the Samyang is extremely sensitive to shifting the focus ring.
The 135mm also has an issue with red halos, which is especially noticeable when using a CLS filter. I've almost developed a strategy of focusing on the red channel (because hydrogen nebulae are the most accessible) and then combining it with the other channels.
At one point, I considered the 85mm for astrophotography, but I realized it's really not suited for that, it seems.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

More photos by Sergeich