DeepSkyHosting

NGC 4565, the Needle Galaxy

Category:Deep Sky
Published:
1890
NGC 4565, the Needle GalaxyNGC 4557IC 3399IC 3415IC 3464IC 3477IC 3480IC 3495IC 3496IC 3497IC 3514IC 3526IC 3527IC 3529IC 3532IC 3535IC 3538IC 3543IC 3545IC 3546IC 3547IC 3549IC 3553IC 3579IC 3594IC 3596IC 3628IC 3630IC 3645IC 3650NGC 4475NGC 4494NGC 4555NGC 4556NGC 4558NGC 4562NGC 4563NGC 4565NGC 4613NGC 4614NGC 4615IC 3395IC 3396IC 3397IC 3421IC 3439IC 3449IC 3450IC 3455IC 3469IC 3479IC 3488IC 3491IC 3498IC 3502IC 3507IC 3508IC 3531IC 3533IC 3536IC 3556IC 3559IC 3560IC 3561IC 3565IC 3571IC 3582IC 3585IC 3599IC 3610IC 3614IC 3618IC 3626IC 3632IC 3640IC 3641IC 3642IC 3644IC 3646IC 3651
Resolution:
5498x3671 px
File size:
18534 KB

Photo description / processing

Two photographs of NGC 4565 (Needle) are grouped together, absolutely identical in all parameters except for the astro cameras. One was taken with a ZWO 2600 MC astro camera (pixel size 3.76 µm), the other with a ZWO 183 MC (pixel size 2.4 µm). In the photograph with the small pixel, more detail is visible, and the galaxy itself is almost twice as large. In the photograph with the 3.76 µm pixel, there is less noise, but not critically. For short-focal-length telescopes (mine is a SharpStar 130 f/2.8, 364 mm), in my amateur opinion, a small-pixel camera is better suited. Resolution for 2.4 µm is 1.4 arcseconds per pixel. Resolution for 3.76 µm is 2.16 arcseconds per pixel. There is a formula on the internet for calculating this.

Technical information

Telescope/Lens
Sharpstar 130/2.8
Camera
ZWO ASI2600MC PRO
Mount
Ioptron HAE 29
Guide Scope
ZWO 30mm f/4 Guide Scope
Guide Camera
SVBONY SV905C
Software
SharpCap 4.0, Siril, Adobe Photoshop
Location
Петушки, Владимирская область, Russia

Light pollution

Orange, Bortle 6 zone

Date taken

Exposure

  • 120 × 60″ · ISO/Gain: 160 ·

Total exposure: 2 h 0 m

Photo versions

NGC 4565, the Needle Galaxy
Current photoUpdated
NGC 4565, the Needle Galaxy

May 30th, 2024

2 h 0 m

Two photographs of NGC 4565 (Needle) are grouped together, absolutely identical in all parameters except for the astro cameras. One was taken with a ZWO 2600 MC astro camera (pixel size 3.76 µm), the other with a ZWO 183 MC (pixel size 2.4 µm). In the photograph with the small pixel, more detail is visible, and the galaxy itself is almost twice as large. In the photograph with the 3.76 µm pixel, there is less noise, but not critically. For short-focal-length telescopes (mine is a SharpStar 130 f/2.8, 364 mm), in my amateur opinion, a small-pixel camera is better suited. Resolution for 2.4 µm is 1.4 arcseconds per pixel. Resolution for 3.76 µm is 2.16 arcseconds per pixel. There is a formula on the internet for calculating this.

Show changes
Previous version
Current version

Comments

There are no comments on this photo yet.

More photos by Ryjov Aleksey