DeepSkyHosting

The Rosette Nebula

malex
56803
Category:Deep Sky
Published:
3638
The Rosette NebulaNGC 2237NGC 2238NGC 2246NGC 2239NGC 2244NGC 2252
Resolution:
2167x1456 px
File size:
11125 KB

Photo description / processing

The Rosette Nebula, or NGC 2237—at least that designation refers to part of it. The nebula is located in the constellation Monoceros, positioned somewhat east and south of the bright star Betelgeuse (Alpha Orionis) in the sky. It is one of the most famous and beautiful gas and dust nebulae. At the center of the nebula, the open star cluster NGC 2244 can be observed, composed of young blue stars. (Discovered by John Flamsteed in 1690.) The distance to the nebula is approximately 5,200 light-years. Its diameter is about 130 light-years. The mass of the nebula is estimated to be around 10,000 solar masses. Due to an abundance of hydrogen, the nebula appears with a reddish hue in most photographs. The entire nebula is threaded with dark dust filaments, some of which are clearly distinguishable in the image. Observations reveal the presence of rapidly moving molecular clumps, the origin of which remains unclear to this day. Imaging date: November 1, 2019. Scale: 70%.

Technical information

Telescope/Lens
Jupiter-37A
Camera
ZWO ASI 178 mm
Mount
Sky-Watcher EQ3-2 MyDrive
Guide Scope
Jupiter-21M
Guide Camera
QHY5
Accessories
Фильтр Baader Planetarium NEODYMIUM 1.25", Бюджетный красный фильтр
Software
MaxIm DL, DeepSkyStacker, FitStacker, Adobe Photoshop
Location
Kharkiv, Ukraine

Light pollution

Orange, Bortle 6 zone

astroscope.ua/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=11994&p=65986#p65986

Exposure

  • 40 × 120″ · ISO/Gain: 230

Total exposure: 1 h 20 m

Comments

malex
Yes. But besides the cutoff filter, I also used a red filter, a very cheap one. However, it significantly improved the aesthetics. So this is not a pure L-channel.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Pavel Zhukov
Yes, from the description, I understand there were two filters in the optical path. With a narrowband filter, it will be even more interesting—the stars will appear even smaller.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

malex
Yes. Narrowband filters are in the plans. I'm thinking about which bandwidth to get: 36 nm or maybe 8 nm.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Pavel Zhukov
In my humble opinion, it's better not to skimp and try to get the 8 nm filter right away. If possible, of course.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

malex
I'll find that opportunity. I'm just wondering if it might be too narrow for my 37 mm aperture?
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Pavel Zhukov
The issue (blue shift) occurs with narrowband filters at large apertures (f/2.0-f/2.8). At f/3.5 or slower, it works fine. I shoot with a 7 nm filter at f/3.33-f/3.5 without complaints—just make sure to calibrate with flats.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

malex
Blue shift... You mean chromatic aberration?
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Pavel Zhukov
No. With narrowband filters, the passband shifts toward the shorter wavelength part of the spectrum with faster (brighter) optics, which can reduce transmission of the desired emission line. However, as mentioned above, for focal ratios of f/2.0 to f/2.8, the effect is significant.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

malex
Where is this information coming from? The filter's bandwidth cannot change. The filter doesn't know what optics are in front of it. Now, the distortions introduced by the lens itself are a different matter. But again, if you pass a hydrogen line through even a single, very fast lens, it's unlikely that Hα will turn into OIII. Or am I misunderstanding something?
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Pavel ZhukovReply to malex
If I remember, I'll try to find the document where the information came from. It's from an Astrodon presentation on the performance of narrowband filters.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

malex
Alright.
It will be interesting to read.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

More photos by malex