DeepSkyHosting

NGC2237 Rosette Nebula in HOO

Category:Deep Sky
Published:
2452
NGC2237 Rosette Nebula in HOONGC 2244NGC 2237NGC 2238NGC 2239NGC 2246NGC 2252
Resolution:
6063x4050 px
File size:
4700 KB

Photo description / processing

Cloudy weather, so I reprocessed the Rosette Nebula using esoteric formulas to extract oxygen. Thanks to the Siril team for Pixel Math in the new version—it was sorely missed. The formulas themselves, in a foreign language, are here: https://thecoldestnights.com/2020/06/pixinsight-dynamic-narrowband-combinations-with-pixelmath/

Technical information

Telescope/Lens
Newtonian 150/750
Camera
RisingCam 571C
Mount
Sky-Watcher HEQ5 Pro (belt-modified)
Guide Scope
Pentax Takumar 200mm f/4 Lens
Guide Camera
T7M
Accessories
Sharpstar 0.95x Coma Corrector
Software
Astro Photography Tool (APT), PHD2, Siril, Topaz DeNoise AI, StarNet++, Luminar
Location
Краснознаменск, Россия

Light pollution

Orange, Bortle 6 zone

Date taken

Exposure

  • 100 × 120″ · ISO/Gain: 100 · Optolong l-eXtreme ·

Total exposure: 3 h 20 m

Photo versions

NGC2237 Rosette Nebula in HOO
Current photoUpdated
NGC2237 Rosette Nebula in HOO

Apr 17th, 2022

3 h 20 m

Cloudy weather, so I reprocessed the Rosette Nebula using esoteric formulas to extract oxygen. Thanks to the Siril team for Pixel Math in the new version—it was sorely missed. The formulas themselves, in a foreign language, are here: https://thecoldestnights.com/2020/06/pixinsight-dynamic-narrowband-combinations-with-pixelmath/

NGC2237 Rosette Nebula in HOO
NGC2237 Rosette Nebula in HOO

Feb 16th, 2022

3 h 0 m

Hooray! The first night suitable for shooting since the beginning of December. Never mind that it was a full moon and I was shooting about 20 degrees from the Moon. The raw frames were scary to look at, but after some gradient work in HOO, it came together nicely. And yes, Starnet++ version 2 is absolutely brilliant—everyone should download it immediately!

Show changes
Previous version
Current version

Comments

Bender B. Rodriguez
Very nice!
But the full size could be slightly reduced—to match the image resolution with the level of detail.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Evgeniy Sergeev
Cool that pixel math is now available. But the processing needs some work—the oxygen looks a bit unnatural, like a blob. The formulas are just for combining channels in HOO or SHO palettes. Since this was shot with a color camera, the oxygen signal is very weak. After combining with pixel math, I do separate processing for the oxygen and then blend it back using a mask. And it definitely doesn’t come together right away.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

BootleggerReply to Evgeniy Sergeev
I ended up on the page with the formulas from the video you recommended. Their main idea is to keep only the signal from oxygen where it dominates, which is why there's a bright spot. If you look at the many photos of the Rosette Nebula on AstroBin, it's clear that the area of oxygen dominance is captured correctly. It's just that with traditional processing, which proportionally mixes the signals from oxygen and hydrogen in the green channel, this region ends up with a whitish, pale color.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

AnatoliiReply to Bootlegger
And another quick question. In my setup with a Newtonian 200 f/5 + Sharpstar 0.95 MPCC + L‑Extreme, the stars are coming out elongated. I tried adjusting the backfocus and checked the telescope collimation, but I couldn’t fix it. Have you ever experienced this effect?
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

More photos by Bootlegger