DeepSkyHosting

LRGBHa M31 Andromeda Galaxy (the Andromeda Galaxy)

oeswww
531208
Published:
357
LRGBHa M31 Andromeda Galaxy (the Andromeda Galaxy)
Resolution:
6114x4035 px
File size:
42426 KB

Photo description / processing

Here you can see the correct addition of hydrogen. There is exactly as much of it here as there should be.
The hydrogen is aligned to the red channel. Then it is stretched in the same way (as the red channel) and added to the red channel of the LRGB image. Of course, after continuum subtraction. I subtracted the continuum manually and added the hydrogen to the red 1 to 1. Without any masks, boost, frasold, or hydrogen contrast. No personal taste, only pure math.

Yes, this is what 46 hours of hydrogen looks like. For the sake of beauty, I would like to pull out more "background" hydrogen, but I did not do this in favor of naturalness.
It is also worth noting that I accumulated a significant portion of the hydrogen under urban light pollution, shooting right from the loggia for almost the entire month) These almost 35 hours of accumulation are inferior to 11 hours of accumulation in Mezmay. Just imagine, the accumulation is 3 times less, but at the same time the noise is 17% lower. This shows that accumulation is not the same as accumulation, if they are collected under different light pollution conditions, even despite a narrow passband of only 3nm! I am also not sure that I integrated the Krasnodar accumulation into the Mezmay one correctly, but the noise decreased by 1.5 percent. I still did not understand by how much the SNR increased. I did not even notice the difference visually. Therefore, perhaps I will return to the hydrogen accumulation and reprocess it, also making an artistic version of the work (with an abundance of hydrogen in the background).

Just for those who want to see hydrogen by itself, I will upload two more images.

Technical information

Telescope/Lens
Askar FRA500
Camera
ZWO ASI2600MM PRO
Mount
Sky-Watcher EQ6-R Pro
Guide Scope
ZWO OAG-L
Guide Camera
ZWO ASI220MM
Accessories
SharpStar 0.7x Focal Reducer for Askar FRA400 / FRA500
Software
Pixinsight, RC-Astro Plugins
Location
Мезмай (Солнечный ветер), Россия
Date taken

Exposure

  • 210 × 120″ · ISO/Gain: 100 · Antlia V Pro L ·
  • 113 × 120″ · ISO/Gain: 100 · Antlia V Pro R ·
  • 113 × 120″ · ISO/Gain: 100 · Antlia V Pro G ·
  • 117 × 120″ · ISO/Gain: 100 · Antlia V Pro B ·
  • 67 × 600″ · ISO/Gain: 100 · Antlia H-a 3nm ·
  • 125 × 1000″ · ISO/Gain: 100 · Antlia H-a 3nm (Krasnodar) ·

Total exposure: 64 h 19 m

Photo versions

LRGBHa M31 Andromeda Galaxy (the Andromeda Galaxy)
Current photo
LRGBHa M31 Andromeda Galaxy (the Andromeda Galaxy)

Sep 27th, 2026

64 h 19 m

Here you can see the correct addition of hydrogen. There is exactly as much of it here as there should be.The hydrogen is aligned to the red channel. Then it is stretched in the same way (as the red channel) and added to the red channel of the LRGB image. Of course, after continuum subtraction. I subtracted the continuum manually and added the hydrogen to the red 1 to 1. Without any masks, boost, frasold, or hydrogen contrast. No personal taste, only pure math.Yes, this is what 46 hours of hydrogen looks like. For the sake of beauty, I would like to pull out more "background" hydrogen, but I did not do this in favor of naturalness.It is also worth noting that I accumulated a significant portion of the hydrogen under urban light pollution, shooting right from the loggia for almost the entire month) These almost 35 hours of accumulation are inferior to 11 hours of accumulation in Mezmay. Just imagine, the accumulation is 3 times less, but at the same time the noise is 17% lower. This shows that accumulation is not the same as accumulation, if they are collected under different light pollution conditions, even despite a narrow passband of only 3nm! I am also not sure that I integrated the Krasnodar accumulation into the Mezmay one correctly, but the noise decreased by 1.5 percent. I still did not understand by how much the SNR increased. I did not even notice the difference visually. Therefore, perhaps I will return to the hydrogen accumulation and reprocess it, also making an artistic version of the work (with an abundance of hydrogen in the background).Just for those who want to see hydrogen by itself, I will upload two more images.

Show changes
Previous version
Current version

Comments

IvanRu
Great work! 125 x 1000" ISO/Gain: 100 - Antlia H-a 3nm (Krasnodar)
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

oeswwwReply to IvanRu
Да прям с города почти с максимальным бортлем. Потому и выдержка побольше. Но это накопление почему-то в копилку дает почти 0. Буду еще Мезмайского накопления добирать и Краснодарское исключать. Хотя оно само по себе свет имеет и по шуму не сильно хуже. Может не так интегрирую. Хз. Пробовал и так и сяк и результат один и тот же.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Iren
For 46 hours, that's pretty weak.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

oeswwwReply to Iren
I wrote about light pollution to convey that accumulation in different Bortles is not equivalent. That is, hours of accumulation in Krasnodar are many, but the result is not even comparable to a small accumulation in Mezmay =) That's the first thing. Also, one should not forget about the speed of accumulation (focal ratio). That is, we already have two variables that make accumulation time insignificant and not reflecting the real picture of signal) Yes, it is a simple indicator for estimating the volume of accumulation, but it is still relative to the same equipment in the same shooting zone.

On the other side of the coin is the faint hydrogen background, which also creates false impressions of low accumulation. But it is simply like that by nature. Therefore, it is not objective to evaluate hours/quality of accumulation by the faint background) Here it is already a matter of taste, but in this case I did it as it actually is :)

In general, I myself am also a fan of "picture" and "artistics" and therefore I will also stretch the background for beauty and publish it on AstroBin. I did not get fancy with stretching at all. Everything was aligned by signal relative to each other and stretched identically. I did not even want to make the core fainter, because it looked natural and very smooth and the point in the center did not stand out at all (I did not want to do 60-second subs and therefore the core is minimal, but it burned out), but in this light pollution there was still a bit of structure and I only slightly applied HDR to the core to reveal it. In short, everything is as close to natural as possible =) I did not even embellish the oxygen in the galaxy separately and it remained as it is.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Alena Kiseleva (Beautys89)
Impressive) how long did you accumulate the signal for?)
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Sabotajnik_Ru
Great! I don't know if I'll ever get around to deep-sky...
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

More photos by oeswww