DeepSkyHosting

NGC 2244 "Rosette"

UrmasX
2532983
Category:Deep Sky
Published:
1001
NGC 2244 "Rosette"NGC 2244NGC 2237NGC 2238NGC 2239NGC 2246NGC 2252
Resolution:
3826x4171 px
File size:
10388 KB

Photo description / processing

I modified the focuser. Instead of a bunch of clamps, tubes, and brackets—just one 3D-printed part and a string (strings are everything!). I had to use a motor without a housing because with the housing, neither the motor itself nor the smaller gear (30 teeth instead of 38) would reach the lens. It turns confidently, backlash is definitely less than 10 steps (ASIA doesn't allow less). I took it out in the cold (-15 to -17°C) and tested it on the sky. FWHM decreased from 7 to 5, but the coma didn't go away. I can also tighten the stars a bit more, and the coma will be less noticeable. This version is a stack of all test frames from 2 nights, with stars taken from 4 frames.

Technical information

Telescope/Lens
TTArtisan 500mm f/6.3 ED Lens
Camera
ZWO ASI2600 Air
Mount
iOptron HEM15
Guide Scope
встроенный датчик
Guide Camera
SC2210
Accessories
ZWO ASIAir в камере, ZWO EAF
Software
SiriL, StarNet++, GraXpert
Location
Токсово, Россия

Light pollution

Red, Bortle 7 zone

Date taken

Exposure

  • 48 × 180″ · ISO/Gain: 101 · фильтр Svbony SV220 ·

Total exposure: 2 h 24 m

Photo versions

NGC 2244 "Rosette"
Updated
NGC 2244 "Rosette"

Feb 24th, 2025

59 m

First light with the setup, only the mount has been tested before. The camera is attached in the focuser with just one screw and no guide pins, causing a clear sensor tilt—the focuser needs to be replaced. I shot the Rosette Nebula specifically to compare with recent photos taken with a 500mm f/6.3 lens and an ASI2600 camera. The goal of the comparison is to decide which setup to keep and improve. So far, this HAWK is in the lead.

NGC 2244 "Rosette"
NGC 2244 "Rosette"

Feb 21st, 2025

3 h 21 m

Added exposure time to the Rosette. Used a cheat technique—stars replaced with synthetic circles from StarNet. Stretched the histogram less. Bright spots from coma remained. But they remained!

NGC 2244 "Rosette"
Current photo
NGC 2244 "Rosette"

Feb 17th, 2025

2 h 24 m

I modified the focuser. Instead of a bunch of clamps, tubes, and brackets—just one 3D-printed part and a string (strings are everything!). I had to use a motor without a housing because with the housing, neither the motor itself nor the smaller gear (30 teeth instead of 38) would reach the lens. It turns confidently, backlash is definitely less than 10 steps (ASIA doesn't allow less). I took it out in the cold (-15 to -17°C) and tested it on the sky. FWHM decreased from 7 to 5, but the coma didn't go away. I can also tighten the stars a bit more, and the coma will be less noticeable. This version is a stack of all test frames from 2 nights, with stars taken from 4 frames.

NGC 2244 "Rosette"
NGC 2244 "Rosette"

Feb 8th, 2025

48 m

Suddenly, the sky cleared up. I took out the TTArtisan 500mm 6.3ED to test it. In the cold (around -10°C), the autofocus motor struggled to turn the focus ring—it only worked intermittently, so autofocus didn't function properly. I never knew how to focus manually, and I still don't; the Bahtinov mask didn't help either. As expected, I didn't achieve focus. Just in case, I shot NGC 2244 for testing. The stars bloated unacceptably, as expected—even StarNet didn't help. It's too early to judge the optical quality; I still need to fine-tune the drive and get proper focus... After adjusting the mount, I had no issues with guiding—drift was around 0.5-0.6". At the end, I broke the remote and almost dropped it from the 5th floor. Had to use duct tape... In the cold, the Wi-Fi on the remote glitches more often—I'll probably go back to using a cable.

Show changes
Previous version
Current version

Comments

More photos by UrmasX