DeepSkyHosting

-

Category:Equipment
Published:
1797
-
Resolution:
6000x4000 px
File size:
10574 KB

Photo description / processing

Newton+RASA=hybrid, everything was assembled in a hurry, time will tell, for now something is wrong with the mount's speed.

Comments

hiparon
Interesting, the camera does block half of the aperture area—is that normal?
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Smirnov AndreyReply to hiparon
I also don't understand why you would give up the diagonal mirror in a standard Newtonian telescope!.. What's the point?
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Igor Glazunov
For the future, instead of a regular camera, an astro camera—is that okay?
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

hiparonReply to Igor Glazunov
Of course it's fine, I just don't understand how the diagonal could be a problem?
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Igor Glazunov
Smirnov Andrey - The less light passes through the surface of the images, the better the quality.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

hiparonReply to Igor Glazunov
Logically reasoning, why is it less? It seems like it should be the same amount. Maybe I'm missing something, could you explain?
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Igor Glazunov
niparon - closer to a physical explanation - Newtonian system, assembly of the optical tube, is not an original assembly of components, made of metal parts, misalignment, bending, etc. During visual observation, this has little effect on quality, but in astrophotography, unfortunately, defects become clearly noticeable. I'm not a theorist; since childhood, I've been used to doing everything on the fly.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

hiparonReply to Igor Glazunov
To be honest, I didn't understand much, but nevertheless, I wish you luck in your experiments! Although theory has always helped practice, don't neglect it—save time, money, and effort.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Igor Glazunov
You don't have a Newtonian system in stock—lucky you—so I decided to get rid of the secondary mirror and the focuser that was attached to the tin tube, as well as the corrector that causes glare. Time will tell what comes of it. Well, money and energy are always running out anyway.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

hiparonReply to Igor Glazunov
For some reason, I don't like open tubes; I prefer closed ones more.
And how do you focus without a focuser?
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

Igor Glazunov
But why without a focuser? The camera is screwed into the tube—that is the rack-and-pinion focuser, so everything is in its place.
Reply

Sign up or sign in to leave a comment.

More photos by Igor Glazunov